| ... | ... | @@ -11,14 +11,13 @@ The idea behind the EM_Glossary is to offer community accepted, harmonised domai |
|
|
|
width="600"
|
|
|
|
alt="EM-Glossary interoperabiltiy" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# why OWL?
|
|
|
|
### Why OWL?
|
|
|
|
OWL is the [Web ontology language](https://www.w3.org/OWL/) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about things, groups of things, and relations between thing) and designed OWL is part of the W3C’s Semantic Web technology stack, which includes RDF, RDFS, SPARQL, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# how to adapt
|
|
|
|
# How to adopt
|
|
|
|
The EM-Glossary provides stable domain-level semantics for adoption into or alignment of application level semantics and other academic use. We envision different levels of adoption.
|
|
|
|
## textual & oral use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## technical adoption into metadata schemas, file formats and semantic artefacts
|
|
|
|
In order to facilitate re-use , we created the front end for easier browsing - put link
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### metadata schemas, records & SKOS vocabularies
|
|
|
|
|
| ... | ... | @@ -40,15 +39,10 @@ How to adapt and use terminology from emg.owl in your application level artefact |
|
|
|
- how to technically adopt
|
|
|
|
- how we expect to be acknowledged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Documentation of emg.owl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### other semantic artefacts based on RDF
|
|
|
|
### other file formats
|
|
|
|
### schemas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# OWL build pipeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# emg.owl release cycle
|
|
|
|
# legal info
|
|
|
|
### OWL build pipeline
|
|
|
|
### emg.owl release cycle
|
|
|
|
### legal info
|
|
|
|
- how to cite
|
|
|
|
- licensing |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
