| ... | ... | @@ -6,18 +6,40 @@ The EM_Glossary groups offers terminology that was harmonised through a communit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea behind the EM_Glossary is to offer community accepted, harmonised domain-level semantics for adoption to the application level. Using the EM_Glossary as a domain level bridge we intend to facilitate metadata alignment between different application cases such as metadata schemas that are recorded with different instruments or annotated using different dialects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<img
|
|
|
|
src="uploads/b8724e5f6b08b801ef4729e55ebc0fd0/EMGlossary_Overview.png"
|
|
|
|
width="600"
|
|
|
|
alt="EM-Glossary interoperabiltiy" />
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# why OWL?
|
|
|
|
OWL is the [Web ontology language](https://www.w3.org/OWL/) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about things, groups of things, and relations between thing) and designed OWL is part of the W3C’s Semantic Web technology stack, which includes RDF, RDFS, SPARQL, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# how to adapt
|
|
|
|
The EM-Glossary provides stable domain-level semantics for adoption into or alignment of application level semantics and other academic use. We envision different levels of adoption.
|
|
|
|
## textual & oral use
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## technical adoption into metadata schemas, file formats and semantic artefacts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### metadata schemas, records & SKOS vocabularies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### semantic file formats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### semantic artefacts (RDF, RDFs, OWL)
|
|
|
|
- import of emg.owl
|
|
|
|
- import of classes from emg.owl with annotation properties
|
|
|
|
- import of classe from emg.owl with partial annotation properties
|
|
|
|
- alignment of own class
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keep emg IRI
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, every case is different and might require stronger or less tight alignment - please feel free to contact us in order to discuss how we could help you with mapping, alignment or harmonisation. Write an email to hmc@fz-juelich.de or hmc-matter@helmholtz-berlin.de or talk to us directly on [HMC public mattermost](https://mattermost.hzdr.de/hmc-public).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How to adapt and use terminology from emg.owl in your application level artefact metadata
|
|
|
|
- how to technically adopt
|
|
|
|
- how we expect to be acknowledged
|
|
|
|
[add some picutre]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### other semantic artefacts based on RDF
|
|
|
|
### other file formats
|
| ... | ... | |
| ... | ... | |
