Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

change plural & singular AP

    • Open Issue created by Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann

    link to skos:altLabel - plural:

    • information
    • encoding process

    delete AP

    • plural (HDO_00001026)
    • singular (HDO_00001024)

    change IRIs of plural & singular (sub-classes of skos:altLabel) to above IRIs

    Edited

    Designs

      Child items ...

      2. Activity

      • Volker Hofmann added tech label

        added tech label

      • Volker Hofmann changed the description

        changed the description

      • Pier Luigi Buttigieg mentioned in merge request !12 (merged)

        mentioned in merge request !12 (merged)

        • Volker Hofmann
          Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
          Author Maintainer

          from this

          Screenshot_from_2023-07-04_16-07-49

          it looks more like we should make plural (HDO_00001026) and singular (HDO_00001024) "usages" of skos:altLabel

          Edited by Volker Hofmann
        • Pier Luigi Buttigieg
          Pier Luigi Buttigieg @pier.buttigieg ·
          Maintainer

          See the examples of usage here:

          http://linkedlifedata.com/resource/skos/altLabel

          A literal plural is a valid range. A literal singular is valid, but only for really alternative labels (different from the primary label), as the primary label must also be singular (or a mass noun short for "a portion of...")

          By that, do we even need "singular"? Do we have terms that are natively plural?

          ...

          On 4 Jul 2023, 16:09, at 16:09, "Volker Hofmann (@v.hofmann)" gitlab@hzdr.de wrote:

          Volker Hofmann commented:

          form this

          Screenshot_from_2023-07-04_16-07-49

          it looks more like we should make plural (HDO_00001026) and singular (HDO_00001024) "usages" of skos:altLabel

          -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: #30 (comment 5439260) You're receiving this email because of your account on codebase.helmholtz.cloud.

          Privacy | Imprint | Support | Status | Documentation | Changelog

        • Volker Hofmann
          Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
          Author Maintainer

          not sure if I understand what you mean with:

          but only for really alternative labels

          ... and what a solution would be or we had initially in mind (I don't understand my own issue description).

          By that, do we even need "singular"? Do we have terms that are natively plural?

          In fact I don't think we need it since all rdfs:label values are singulars (if not mass-nouns). The only other case I can think of are "information", "knowledge". For "data" we are using the class "datum" and discussed to also add a class "data" - however this is not needed at the moment as many other terms either work well with "datum" or, if not, relate to "data set".

          Can you spell our for stupid me what we the current problem is and what we need to do here? What do we mean with

          link to skos:altLabel - plural:

          • encoding process
          • information
          Edited by Volker Hofmann
        • Volker Hofmann
          Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
          Author Maintainer

          i mean: its clear to me that we want to delete the HDO annotation properties "plural" (HDO_00001026) & "singular" (HDO_00001024) - and instead have the plural values be expressed by skos:altLabel. What I don't understand/remember is why we noted down "encoding process" and "information" specifically for this?? I think that should be changed generally, right?

          Edited by Volker Hofmann
        • Volker Hofmann
          Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
          Author Maintainer

          are we looking to create something like this:

          # Annotation Property: <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> (acronym)

AnnotationAssertion(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115> <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> "The non-unique initials or abbreviated name used for identification. [Definition Source: NCI]")
AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> "acronym"@en)
SubAnnotationPropertyOf(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> skos:altLabel)

          but for plural (what external vocab can we link to? NCIT doesn't seem to have a plural def., on OLS the most used way seems to be http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OMO_0003004 - but this is a synonym-type-propertiy (i.e. not skos:altLabel)), replace all "plural (HDO_00001026)" and remove all "singular (HDO_00001024)"

          ?

          Edited by Volker Hofmann
        • Pier Luigi Buttigieg
          Pier Luigi Buttigieg @pier.buttigieg ·
          Maintainer

          I think so. If we can't find a property out there, we mint our own until we can replace it.

          I'm not such a fan of NCIT for such general terms - it's a scope mismatch. I'd rather use our own (with a cross ref to NCIT)

          ...

          On 5 Jul 2023, 09:18, at 09:18, "Volker Hofmann (@v.hofmann)" gitlab@hzdr.de wrote:

          Volker Hofmann commented on a discussion: #30 (comment 5440624)

          are we looking to create something like this:

          (acronym)

AnnotationAssertion(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115>
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> "The non-unique initials
or abbreviated name used for identification. [Definition Source: NCI]")
AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label
<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495> "acronym"@en)
SubAnnotationPropertyOf(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NCIT_C93495>
skos:altLabel)

          but for plural (what external vocab can we link to? NCIT doesn't seem to have a plural def.), replace all "plural (HDO_00001026)" and remove all "singular (HDO_00001024)"

          ?

          -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab: #30 (comment 5440624) You're receiving this email because of your account on codebase.helmholtz.cloud.

          Privacy | Imprint | Support | Status | Documentation | Changelog

        • Volker Hofmann
          Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
          Author Maintainer

          Hm, "minting our own" sounds however like keeping "plural (HDO_000001026)" (but describing it better - see below)

          Looking into HDO we are using the following annotation properties (list excludes dce, dcterms, oboInOwl, owl, skos):

          Screenshot_from_2023-07-05_09-51-16

          From that, both NCIT and IAO could be considered a "scope mismatch", i.e. to be replaced. I have the following questions:

          Regarding the HDO properties I think i understand we want to do the following:

          Question 1: what are we doing here:

          • Declaration(AnnotationProperty(:HDO_00001024)) -> "singular" ToDo: remove throughout HDO*
          • Declaration(AnnotationProperty(:HDO_00001026)) -> "plural" *ToDo: edit according to the following:
          # Annotation Property: :HDO_00001024 (plural)

AnnotationAssertion(<http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/IAO_0000115> :HDO_00001024 "plural form of term label")
AnnotationAssertion(rdfs:label :HDO_00001024 "plural"@en)
SubAnnotationPropertyOf(:HDO_00001024 skos:altLabel)

          Question 2: Would the above actually work? (i.e. i replaced the "" term in the above example with ":HDO_0001026"

          Also I need an opinion on the following: :

          Question 3: are we looking to replace those:

          Question 4: what is the best way to replace those (defining them ourselves again?):

        • Please register or sign in to reply
      • Volker Hofmann changed milestone to %Release 1

        changed milestone to %Release 1

      • Volker Hofmann changed the description

        changed the description

      • Volker Hofmann added NEXT UP label

        added NEXT UP label

      • Leon Steinmeier added waiting for Volker label

        added waiting for Volker label

      • Leon Steinmeier removed waiting for Volker label

        removed waiting for Volker label

      • Leon Steinmeier assigned to @v.hofmann

        assigned to @v.hofmann

      • Volker Hofmann added ForSprint label and removed NEXT UP label

        added ForSprint label and removed NEXT UP label

      • Volker Hofmann added NEXT UP label and removed ForSprint label

        added NEXT UP label and removed ForSprint label

      • Volker Hofmann assigned to @s.fathalla and unassigned @v.hofmann

        assigned to @s.fathalla and unassigned @v.hofmann

      • Volker Hofmann
        Volker Hofmann @v.hofmann ·
        Author Maintainer

        plural (HDO_00001026) is still used for singular (HDO_00001024)

        • unit role
        • ..
        • ..
      Please register or sign in to reply

      A HIFIS Service | Privacy | Imprint | Support | Documentation | Changelog