If you want to generate a Sophie Germain / safe prime pair with this
code, then after you've made p, you need to test the primality of
2p+1.

The easiest way to do that is to make a PrimeCandidateSource that is
so constrained as to only be able to deliver 2p+1 as a candidate, and
then run the ordinary prime generation system. The problem is that the
prime generation loops forever, so if 2p+1 _isn't_ prime, it will just
keep testing the same number over and over again and failing the test.

To solve this, I add a 'one-shot mode' to the PrimeCandidateSource
itself, which will cause it to return NULL if asked to generate a
second candidate. Then the prime-generation loops all detect that and
return NULL in turn. However, for clients that _don't_ set a pcs into
one-shot mode, the API remains unchanged: pcs_generate will not return
until it's found a prime (by its own criteria).

This feels like a bit of a bodge, API-wise. But the other two obvious
approaches turn out more awkward.

One option is to extract the Pockle from the PrimeGenerationContext
and use that to directly test primality of 2p+1 based on p - but that
way you don't get to _probabilistically_ generate safe primes, because
that kind of PGC has no Pockle in the first place. (And you can't make
one separately, because you can't convince it that an only
probabilistically generated p is prime!)

Another option is to add a test() method to PrimeGenerationPolicy,
that sits alongside generate(). Then, having generated p, you just
_test_ 2p+1. But then in the provable case you have to explain to it
that it should use p as part of the proof, so that API would get
awkward in its own way.

So this is actually the least disruptive way to do it!