@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ It seems to be a good idea to rely on community maintained channels that include
### The larger picture
Beyond the problem with Anaconda's `defaults` channel, it is worth to mention that currently reproducible science relies to a significant extend on the abily to freely use services offered by companies, see discussion [here](https://galaxyproject.org/news/2024-08-20-opinion-conda/).
Beyond the problem with Anaconda's `defaults` channel, it is worth to mention that currently reproducible science relies to a significant extend on the availability to freely use services offered by companies, see discussion [here](https://galaxyproject.org/news/2024-08-20-opinion-conda/).
It's easy to blame Anaconda Inc for the TOS change, but maybe a bit of appreciation might be appropriate, but communication certainly [might have been better](https://www.theregister.com/2024/08/08/anaconda_puts_the_squeeze_on/).
Also note that Anaconda Inc. continues to [provide substantial resources](https://galaxyproject.org/news/2024-08-20-opinion-conda/) for free to everyone (and in particular the scientific community).